Why are all the Black kids sitting together in the cafeteria?

Ever since my kids were little one of my favorite after school questions was “who did you sit with at lunch?” When my son Max went to high school I noticed that despite having Black friends, he never mentioned eating with them. When asked why, he said he didn’t know but that they all sat together. I was baffled. What had changed in high school? Was it because he was attending a private school? Was it a racist place? Had we made a mistake?

I mentioned my concern to a Black friend who had attended the same school as Max. He said it was the same in the 90’s and explained that it was due to shared experiences. Many of the Black kids took public transportation to school and came from non-parochial elementary schools. They felt more comfortable together. He didn’t seem concerned, so I let it go. 

Flash forward to the first antiracist conversation group I hosted last summer. The discussion got heated when the topic of lunch room sorting surfaced. There was much surmising as so why some of us witnessed segregated seating in our various school experiences and some of us didn’t. We fumbled our way through dialogue about how much of it had to do with certain locations and ages being more racist than others. None of us felt like we could speak to what was going on, and there was much frustration. 

Jump to today. I’ve just read the book Why Are All the Black Kids Sitting Together in the Cafeteria? by Beverly Daniel Tatum. She explains the role of personal identity development and how in adolescence most of us struggle with questions about who we are and how we fit into the world. For those of us who see our race as the standard, racial identity isn’t on our radar, but for those of us who are beginning to understand our race as perceived as a deviation of the norm, perhaps due to experiencing various micro and macro aggressions, seeking out peers who understand and can reflect understanding of our experience back to us is of vital importance, hence the separate cafeteria seating. 

This theory also explains why students of different races may congregate readily in elementary cafeterias and may choose not to as they enter the stages of self- exploration and identity development in high school. In addition, it explains why not all Black students feel the need to self-sort, as adolescents vary in both experience and timing of identity development. 

I’d like now to come back to the idea of white people not necessarily having to consider race as part of our personal identity development. Why would we? We see ourselves reflected back to us positively everywhere we look: on TV, in the movies and in leadership positions from the classroom to the capitol. We are the norm and we have been for as long as we can remember.

Though many white people don’t choose to reflect upon being white, I believe the murder of George Floyd and the ensuing BLM movements and resistance to these movements during the critical pause of the pandemic and under the exclusionary rhetoric of Donald Trump have caused many of us to feel the need to explore what it means to be white and our role in current events. 

Like the Black kids sitting together in the cafeteria, we too need to come together to share our experiences of racial development. We need to share our stories of coming into racial awareness, of the discomfort and the fuck-ups, of the guilt, fear and frustration. We need to gather with other people interested in developing white identity, one not based on assumed normalcy or felt superiority, but rather one based on reality, cognizant of the current system of racism set up for our advantage.

We need to gather with other white people who are further along in the process and acting as change-agents, who can accept where we are and compassionately offer guidance for us in noticing our blind spots and taking steps toward dismantling personal and cultural racism. 

We need to strive toward techno-colored vision— toward appreciating the uniqueness of each person we encounter, regardless of race, while at the same time recognizing the role race plays in our all our experiences. We need to strive for equality for all, with focus on our own liberation from patterns of socialization that lead to the oppression of self and others. 

We need to create a world in which school isn’t felt to be a racialized space, where Blacks aren’t feeling the need to segregate, a world in which asking “why are all the Black kids sitting together in the cafeteria?” is a question of the past.

Home

Since Covid-19 struck our planet, I’ve become a little more cognizant of the importance of home. I appreciate the efforts I’ve taken over the years to make ours cozy, the ample space we have to spread out and the four parks we can reach within a twenty minute walk. 

What I wasn’t appreciating until very recently is more important than all of the above. My family is warm and safe and not in fear of being evicted, we have17 years of equity built and we live in a good neighborhood. 

What makes a neighborhood good?

I’d venture to say that most would agree on quality schools, low crime and easy access to shopping and recreation.

What makes a neighborhood best?

I discovered recently that in 1935 the “BEST” neighborhoods were defined by the federal government (with help from local real estate experts) as those that were all-white. It was in these neighborhoods, (along with yet-to-be-built neighborhoods outside the city center) where they chose to invest. They defined as “HAZARDOUS” mostly Black neighborhoods and denied them federal investment. They lured whites out of the in-between neighborhoods labeled “DEFINITELY DECLINING” and “STILL DESIRABLE” and into new suburban construction by offering federally backed low-interest rate and long-term mortgages. These investment opportunities were not available to Blacks.

Housing discrimination based upon race was made illegal in 1968, but Omaha’s racial map looks virtually the same today as it did when it was legal. 

What does this mean for our city? 

  • Omaha is the 38th most segregated city in the U.S. 
  • 70% of white households own homes, compared to only 30% of Black households.
  • Due to middle class wealth being accumulated by home-equity, the wealth of Omaha whites is 20 times that of Blacks.
  • Poor whites live in neighborhoods of > opportunity than poor Blacks.
  • Exclusionary development continues to be the norm.
  • Black applicants are denied home loans at 2x the rate of white applicants.
  • Due to our city custom of annexing private neighborhoods built by private developers, we have an alarming lack of affordable housing in Western Omaha as well as a city-wide shortage. (There is affordable housing available for only 19% of the households eligible for it).
  • Our city’s Western-most school district is 88% white with 6% of students receiving free or reduced lunch while our Eastern-most district is 29% white with 74% receiving free and reduced lunch.
  • Renters living in non-white census tracts are evicted at a rate of 41 per tract, per year compared to 17 for those living in white census tracts.   
  • Most of these evictions are in properties with open code violations, meaning the renters are awaiting the landlord to fix a roof, toilet, hole in the wall, etc. (the average critical code case is open 672 days in Omaha).

All of this means that while I’m home being grateful for comfort, space and quality of life, many in Omaha -most of whom live in a different geographical part of the city- are worried about being evicted from a substandard housing unit. They are not enjoying the wealth, health and opportunity that come with home-ownership. They are not able to choose where they live due to a lack of options. This current segregation is setting the stage for continuation of the status quo. 

What can we as Omahans do to create change?

-Become informed. 
-Start and stay in conversation. 
-Bring these concerns to our city council members and our mayor. 
-Create path-ways to increase home-ownership (wealth) for our Black -community members.  
-Incentivize and create policy around building more affordable housing in more areas of Omaha. 

In the words of Omaha’s Dr. Erin Feichtinger, 

We need to create and address housing policies that increase equality with the same level of specificity and intentionality that we once created housing policy that codified racism and inequity in our communities. 

As the old saying goes, it all starts at home.

*These learnings happened via Dr. Palma Strand’s article “’Mirror, Mirror, on the Wall…’: Reflections on Fairness and Housing in the Omaha-Council Bluffs Region as well as the Open Sky Policy Institute’s Policy and Equity Webinars.